Audit-Ready Evidence For Every Ledger, Model, and Framework.
Vero AI applies formal control logic to trial balances, reconciliations, spreadsheet models, and review documentation — re-performing the numbers and evaluating the evidence against SOX, COSO, PCAOB expectations, and the local regimes your subsidiaries report under.
Financial controls testing still runs on tick marks and tie-outs
Finance and internal audit teams produce more structured, more numeric evidence than any other function — and still test it by hand, one sample at a time, once a quarter.
Frameworks finance & internal audit teams are held to
Named frameworks are supported out of the box. Local regimes and internal methodologies are modeled as custom control sets — built the same way, clause by clause, evidence type by evidence type.
Financial controls testing aligned to the COSO Internal Control framework and PCAOB's top-down, risk-based testing standards (AS 2201 / AS 2101).
Service-organization controls over financial reporting and information security for outsourced finance and close processes.
Control environment and audit-of-ICFR expectations reflected in how each control is scoped, tested, and evidenced.
Any internal policy, close-process control, or regional regulation — encoded once, evaluated consistently everywhere.
Modeled on the risk-based approach used across the profession — including Thomson Reuters' PPC audit guides — risk assessment, tailored audit programs, and workpaper documentation encoded as testable control logic.
Deterministic recalculation of formulas, tie-outs, and numeric outputs — not just document and text review — across Excel-based close, consolidation, and forecasting models.
Internal control reporting under Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Act — company-level and process-level controls, evaluated the same way as domestic SOX.
CEO/CFO certification support for disclosure controls and ICFR effectiveness under Canadian securities law.
Statutory accounts under the Handelsgesetzbuch, KonTraG/BilMoG risk-management disclosures, and IFRS consolidated reporting — evaluated in one pass.
Built for the SOX program and the global group
A US ICFR program and a multinational group face the same underlying problem — repetitive control testing over numeric evidence — but the regimes and reporting lines differ.
Controllers, SOX leads, and internal audit teams running an annual ICFR program under external auditor scrutiny.
- SOX controls tested to one standard across every cycle
- Management review controls evidenced with the review actually performed
- Reconciliations and roll-forwards re-performed rather than sampled
- Workpapers your external auditor can follow without a walkthrough call
Groups consolidating subsidiaries across regimes, where the same control has to satisfy several regulators at once.
- J-SOX, C-SOX, HGB, and KonTraG modeled as custom control sets
- Shared controls tested once and credited to every regime that relies on them
- Local-language evidence evaluated against the group control definition
- One consolidated view of control health across every entity
The control everyone documents and no one tests
End-user computing is where most financial reporting risk actually lives. Vero AI treats the spreadsheet as evidence: the calculation is re-performed, the inputs are traced, and the tie-out to the ledger is shown — so the control is evidenced rather than asserted.
- Formulas and footings re-performed, not eyeballed
- Inputs traced to the source system they claim to come from
- Version integrity and change history evidenced
- Every variance reported with the cell-level detail behind it
SOX, internal audit, and global regimes — answered
AI bias audits and adverse impact analysis, evaluated against every hiring regulation you operate under.
One bias audit. Every hiring jurisdiction.
- Selection-rate and adverse impact analysis run on live hiring data
- Evaluated against NYC LL144, Colorado AI Act, EU AI Act, and Title VII
- Auditor-ready workpapers instead of a spreadsheet a consultant built once