Blog
Top 8 AuditBoard Competitors for Better GRC in 2025
Audits put a lot of weight on teams. Evidence piles up fast, files land in different places, and review cycles stretch longer than anyone expects. Every deadline feels closer than the last one, and the work turns into a constant race to keep everything organized.
Many companies use AuditBoard to bring order to that pressure. It helps, but some teams hit limits once their evidence sets grow or their programs get more complex.
They want more speed, clearer scoring, and workflows that don’t slow down when the workload spikes. They want a setup that stays sharp even when the audit season hits its hardest point.
If you’re in that spot and feel the process dragging, this guide walks through the top alternatives that give teams a faster way to move through reviews, handle evidence cleanly, and stay steady during heavy audit cycles.
What Does AuditBoard Do?
AuditBoard gives you one connected place for audit and risk work. You bring your risks, controls, policies, issues, and test plans into a single system.
Source: auditboard.com
From there, you manage Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) compliance, internal audits, IT reviews, and broader risk management programs in one flow. You set up controls, map them to frameworks, assign owners, and track status without chasing separate files.
AuditBoard’s Workflows help your team move tasks from planning and testing to wrapping up. Leadership gets a clear view of progress and open issues instead of scattered updates.
Many teams treat it as their core audit management hub, with modules for SOX, operational audits, environmental, social, governance (ESG), and third-party risk.
Evidence lives beside each control, which makes reviews faster and keeps your history in one place.
Why Teams Look for an AuditBoard Alternative
AuditBoard handles a wide range of work for audit and risk teams, yet gaps still show up once your programs grow.
You deal with tight deadlines, shifting scopes, and complex compliance needs spanning multiple frameworks. The pressure builds fast, and the platform can feel heavier than expected.
Common friction points show up in everyday work:
You want stronger automation capabilities that cut review time and help your team move faster.
Internal audit teams spend too much time on long setups, detailed configuration, and an initial learning curve that slows audit preparation and risk assessments.
Licensing costs increase while your headcount stays the same, which makes long-term use harder to justify.
Leaders in enterprise organizations need predictable pricing that still supports solid compliance and risk management.
You work across multiple frameworks and need a single place to manage compliance, keep clean audit trails, and maintain steady operational efficiency.
When these issues feel familiar, you start to scan for AuditBoard competitors that match your pace and fit the way your team works every day.
Top 8 AuditBoard Alternatives in 2025
Audit work moves fast, and you need a system that can keep up with the volume. The tools below help teams manage evidence, controls, and tasks with less friction and more clarity.
1. Vero AI
Vero AI gives your team a faster, cleaner way to handle audits when the workload starts to feel too heavy. You upload your evidence, pick any framework, and get clear results in seconds.
The platform handles hundreds of documents at once and cuts review cycles by 50% or more, which matters when you manage tight deadlines and large control sets.
Teams searching for stronger automation often move toward Vero AI because it evaluates content without long onboarding. It fits any framework, supports custom ones, and keeps every control connected across your entire process.
IRIS GRC adds another layer for enterprise programs that want deeper analysis, broader policy coverage, and clear next steps across complex environments.
Key Features
Rapid evidence assessment - The engine reviews large volumes of documents and identifies what matters, which reduces unnecessary back and forth.
AI-driven scoring - Controls are evaluated with traceable logic that gives your reviewers clarity without extra manual effort.
Multi-framework support - You can work across all standards at once, including regulatory and corporate frameworks, with instant evaluations.
Standard-specific reports - Receive clean summaries that match the exact structure of each requirement.
Vero AI Agents - Seven specialized agents help with evaluations, policies, questionnaires, procurement checks, vendor risk, and ROI analysis.
Iris GRC - A dedicated engine for global enterprises that want stronger control analysis, complex regulatory coverage, and clearer guidance.
Secure architecture - Customers own their data inside a protected workspace with strict controls and continuous monitoring.
Vero AI keeps the work simple. You save hours, avoid rework, and get clear answers even when your team handles heavy audit pressure.
It’s a practical upgrade for anyone comparing AuditBoard competitors and wanting speed and accuracy at the same time.
2. Vanta
Companies use Vanta when they want a lighter, automation-focused option for security certifications and continuous monitoring.
Source: vanta.com
It centralizes controls, policies, tasks, and system checks in one workspace, which helps teams standardize their audit processes without managing everything manually.
Vanta supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and other frameworks with automated checks and a structured control library.
The platform integrates with cloud services and engineering tools to maintain compliance data, simplify evidence collection, and keep audit readiness visible throughout the year.
Key Features
Centralized workspace - Policies, controls, and evidence stored in one place for easier internal audit management.
Automated evidence collection - Connectors pull activity data into mapped controls to reduce manual uploads.
Continuous monitoring - Ongoing checks surface issues early for smoother audit preparation.
Integration library - Connects to cloud providers, repos, and SaaS systems to support compliance operations.
Policy templates -Prebuilt content for common frameworks and recurring certification needs.
Downside
Pricing often feels high for smaller teams that only need basic coverage. Some users report setup effort, an initial learning curve, and limited integrations for certain niche tools, which leads to manual work during audits.
3. Drata
Many teams look at Drata when they want a security-focused compliance management platform that feels lighter than a full governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) suite.
Source: drata.com
It helps compliance teams track policies, controls, and assets in one place while using compliance automation. Dashboards show compliance status, open tasks, and mapped controls to streamline audits with less manual work.
Drata often comes up as an AuditBoard alternative for cloud-first teams that rely on integrations with their existing systems.
Its focus on continuous compliance monitoring and automated checks supports security certifications, vendor oversight, and core security controls without building custom workflows.
Key Features
Automated workflows - Map controls to systems and reduce manual uploads.
Continuous monitoring - Track issues over time and mitigate risks earlier.
Integration library - Connects to cloud, HR, and ticketing tools for smoother compliance tracking.
Trust Center - Share security posture externally as part of your compliance program.
User-friendly interface - Guided tasks help smaller teams manage controls effectively.
Downside
Some users mention initial setup effort, a steeper learning curve, and gaps in integrations that limit otherwise strong integration capabilities. Pricing can feel high for startups, and customer support response time sometimes slows teams that need quick answers.
4. Archer
Many teams consider Archer when they need a broad governance approach that supports enterprise risk and large-scale compliance processes. It helps organizations track risks, assessments, audits, and exceptions while using workflow automation to route reviews.
Source: archerirm.com
Companies with mature programs often use Archer to support compliance reporting, vendor reviews, and internal control mapping across multiple teams.
Archer is frequently compared to AuditBoard when organizations want deeper configuration options and wider support for compliance frameworks. Its flexibility gives teams room to build custom modules for third-party risk management, cyber risk management, and policy oversight.
These options help teams consolidate data, improve visibility, and maintain compliance progress across complex environments, though they often require more technical expertise to maintain.
Key Features
Customizable workflows - Support detailed reviews and tailored processes.
Risk dashboards - Help teams prioritize risks and track metrics.
Vendor management - Centralizes oversight of external partners.
Policy and audit modules - Support structured compliance workflows.
Incident management - Capture and track security or operational issues.
Downside
Because deeper configuration requires dedicated resources, some teams struggle with the setup. Reporting flexibility feels restricted for certain workflows, and the interface can take time for newer users to get comfortable with.
5. LogicGate Risk Cloud
LogicGate Risk Cloud often comes up when teams want flexible governance, risk, and compliance workflows instead of a fixed template.
Source: logicgate.com
It gives risk owners one place to link issues, controls, and assessments, then use configurable apps to streamline compliance and show how compliance efforts connect to broader business risk.
AuditBoard comparisons come up when businesses need more tailored workflows for third-party management, operational risk, and risk mitigation strategies.
Prebuilt apps help teams map regulatory requirements and track findings so they can ensure audit readiness and support high-level views for compliance leaders.
Key Features
Configurable apps - Build and adapt workflows for different risk use cases.
Risk registers - Capture risks, scores, and actions in one view.
Control libraries - Link tests, owners, and evidence for audits.
Vendor oversight - Support reviews and decisions on key suppliers.
Reporting tools - Summarize status for stakeholders.
Downside
The platform still has a learning curve, and navigation can feel complex in larger builds. Reporting features need refinement, and some teams want more polished dashboards and visualizations before treating it as a primary reporting layer.
6. SAI360
Many global organizations use SAI360 to connect ethics, risk, audit, and compliance on one platform. Teams manage governance risk and compliance programs, policies, and training while ensuring regulatory compliance with changing regulatory requirements.
Source: sai360.com
For compliance leaders, it often sits alongside other enterprise compliance solutions to tie issues, actions, and ownership together.
Configurable modules and workflows help streamline compliance across risk registers, incidents, business continuity, and third-party management.
Dashboards and reports summarize status, support financial reporting disclosures, and highlight risk mitigation strategies for complex organizations.
Key Features
Configurable modules - Adapt workflows for risk, audit, policy, and training.
Risk registers - Link risks, controls, and mitigation actions.
Analytics and reporting - Track compliance progress at a program-wide level.
Business continuity tools - Support planning and service management processes.
Training and learning tools - Deliver compliance training with trackable completion data.
Downside
A steeper learning curve and complex configuration are common challenges. Customizing advanced features usually requires technical skills, which can add to long-term expenses..
7. Secureframe
Teams that want to automate SOC 2 and security certifications often look at Secureframe. The platform keeps policies, assets, and evidence in one hub so you can automate compliance tasks.
Source: secureframe.com
Dashboards and reminders support ongoing readiness for audits. Secureframe supports multiple compliance frameworks and fits into integrated risk management programs that track vendors and internal controls together.
Automation and integrations with cloud, HR, and ticketing tools reduce manual prep for audits and keep progress visible.
Key Features
Automated workflows - Connect systems, pull evidence, and automate compliance checks.
Framework coverage - Support for multiple compliance frameworks and security standards.
Real-time monitoring - Show control status and open tasks on a clear dashboard.
Customer support - Offer guidance during setup and audit preparation.
Vendor risk tools - Track assessments and manage external partners more effectively.
Downside
Teams often run into integration gaps with custom apps, and setup can be confusing at first. Reporting tools feel light, and pricing tends to be less friendly for early-stage companies.
8. Hyperproof
Teams looking for a central hub for controls, risks, and evidence often use Hyperproof. It helps compliance and security teams track audits, map controls, and reuse evidence so they don’t repeat work.
Source: hyperproof.io
Dashboards highlight open tasks and gaps to support readiness for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and similar standards. Collaboration features let owners update controls, attach proof, and respond to requests in one workspace.
Integrations with tools like Jira, Slack, and storage apps reduce manual follow-up and keep everyone aligned during audit periods.
Key Features
Centralized workspace - Keep controls and evidence managed in one hub.
Evidence reuse - Link one document to multiple frameworks or requirements.
Multi-framework mapping - Align controls across SOC 2, ISO, and internal frameworks.
Task workflows - Assign tasks, manage reminders, and monitor completion.
Risk register module - Connect risks to controls and track mitigation actions.
Downside
The platform offers a lighter dashboard and reporting features, and its risk and vendor modules aren’t as mature yet. Setup may take time, and there are gaps in risk calculations and templates. Smaller teams may also find the pricing steep.
Why Many Teams Choose Vero AI Over Other AuditBoard Alternatives
Teams comparing AuditBoard competitors often choose Vero AI because it removes the friction that slows audits down.
Long setup cycles, heavy manual reviews, and scattered workflows fade once evidence runs through Vero’s engine.
Reviewers handle large document sets in seconds, see clear next steps, and avoid the back-and-forth that drains time during peak audit cycles.
Another reason teams switch is Vero AI’s depth across a wide range of frameworks.
You can run evaluations for SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI, HIPAA, GDPR, NYDFS, HITRUST CSF, NIST AI RMF, CMMC, VIOLET, NDIS, ISO 42001, and custom standards without managing separate tools or rewriting controls.
One upload works across all programs, giving leaders consistent scoring across the entire environment.
Vero also stands out for its seven purpose-built AI Agents, each designed to remove repetitive audit work and support fast decision-making:
Compliance Evaluation Agent - Scores any file against any framework.
Policy Agent - Builds and tunes policies with your standards.
Third-Party Risk Agent - Flags vendor risks and weak controls.
Procurement Agent - Reviews bidders and matches them to your criteria.
Questionnaire Agent - Completes security questionnaires using stored answers.
ROI Agent - Links process data to measurable value.
Custom Agent - Tailored logic for your data and workflows.
Here’s what Vero AI users say:
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“We have presented Vero AI with some unique challenges. Their technology has helped our clients make sense of the vast data that they receive from us.“
— Dan Cahill, Ph.D., Managing Principal, HSD Metrics
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“Vero AI is doing amazing work to demonstrate how gen AI can be used to make sense of information and help organizations make better, safer decisions.”
—Catherine Stihler, Advisor and former CEO of Creative Commons
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“Vero AI has built a platform that is miles ahead of everything else on the market. They understand AI at a level of few others in the industry.”
—Ben Waber, PhD, Visiting Professor, MIT Media Lab
Vero continues to be the choice for teams that want speed, clarity, and real structure without complexity. With deep framework coverage, powerful AI agents, and proven results, it gives audit and compliance teams a faster path to readiness and a more confident review cycle.
Vero AI: The Best AuditBoard Alternative in 2025
Audits shouldn’t feel chaotic or slow. When evidence grows, deadlines tighten, and review cycles stack on each other, you need a system that gives your team space to move faster and work with more confidence. That’s where Vero AI becomes the clear choice.
It removes the friction that weighs teams down. Manual sorting drops away, repeated checks stop piling up, and next steps stay clear from the start.
You upload your documents, run your evaluations, and get clean results in seconds. Instead of wrestling with tools during audit season, you stay focused on the work that matters.
Vero AI brings speed, accuracy, and structure together in one platform. With deep framework coverage, powerful compliance automation, and purpose-built AI Agents, it supports every part of the audit cycle without adding complexity.
If you want a smoother review process and a platform built for heavy audit workloads, Vero AI is the most reliable upgrade.
See how fast your next audit can move. Book a demo and experience Vero AI in action.
FAQs About AuditBoard Competitors
Who does AuditBoard compete with?
AuditBoard competes with GRC and audit management platforms such as Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, LogicGate, Hyperproof, Archer, and SAI360.
These tools offer similar compliance workflows, automated testing options, and robust features for teams managing audits across multiple frameworks.
Who is the parent company of AuditBoard?
AuditBoard’s parent company is Hg, a UK-based private equity firm specializing in enterprise software investments. In 2024, AuditBoard was acquired by Hg for over $3 billion, making Hg the parent and controlling shareholder for AuditBoard going into 2026.
What is the difference between AuditBoard and Drata?
AuditBoard focuses on internal audit, SOX, risk management, and enterprise compliance programs, while Drata centers on security certifications like SOC 2 and ISO 27001 with automated checks.
AuditBoard supports broader audit cycles, and Drata emphasizes continuous monitoring with faster setup for smaller security teams.
What kind of software is AuditBoard?
AuditBoard is a cloud-based compliance solution for audit, SOX, and risk management that helps teams manage evidence, controls, issues, and testing workflows in one system.
Organizations use it to centralize audit documentation, streamline reviews, and track risk activities across multiple programs.
